tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post1951093652677890638..comments2024-03-27T20:28:38.015-04:00Comments on Reasonable Christian: Calvin On the Hypostatic Union In the One Person of Jesus ChristCharlie J. Rayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18185331029930925967noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-13718490089709597672010-04-19T00:04:23.196-04:002010-04-19T00:04:23.196-04:00Nathan, if one takes that one section out the tota...Nathan, if one takes that one section out the total context of what Calvin had to say, I would agree. But in the context he clearly says the two natures do not communicate what is incommunicable and that the divine nature is not changed.<br /><br />He is talking here of passages of Scripture which assign the attributes of both natures to the one Person of Jesus Christ.<br /><br />I fail to see Charlie J. Rayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18185331029930925967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-9964245329386906922010-04-18T23:23:35.204-04:002010-04-18T23:23:35.204-04:00WITH SUCH PREROGATIVES THE SON OF GOD WAS INVESTED...<i>WITH SUCH PREROGATIVES THE SON OF GOD WAS INVESTED ON HIS MANIFESTATION IN THE FLESH, AND THOUGH HE POSSESSED THE SAME WITH THE FATHER BEFORE THE WORLD WAS CREATED, STILL IT WAS NOT IN THE SAME MANNER OR RESPECT.</i><br /><br />This statement seems to imply change in the hypostasis of the Word. The Word is impassable, and the incarnation added nothing to the divine Person of the Word (rather, Nathannoreply@blogger.com