tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post3218261696135452436..comments2024-03-27T20:28:38.015-04:00Comments on Reasonable Christian: Did Gordon H. Clark Cross the Line into Nestorianism?Charlie J. Rayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18185331029930925967noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-15765093691480470232016-12-05T13:34:53.755-05:002016-12-05T13:34:53.755-05:00In case you missed it in my other articles, my vie...In case you missed it in my other articles, my views have changed. I no longer view Clark's position as nestorianism for the simple reason that Clark stands within orthodoxy by recognizing that Jesus had a real and genuine human soul or mind which is not replaced by the Logos or second Person of the Trinity. Jesus's human nature includes a human mind that is not omniscient. The Logos Charlie J. Rayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18185331029930925967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-38592562552968586392016-11-19T21:29:08.200-05:002016-11-19T21:29:08.200-05:00Half way down, the paragraph that starts with &quo...Half way down, the paragraph that starts with "So for Clark to re-invent Christianity..." the word "the" needs to be omitted toward the end. Great article, I will definitely look deeper into this. Thank you for this very well written article. The Clarkianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17259422861256720046noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-52348594394772084922012-09-01T08:27:39.641-04:002012-09-01T08:27:39.641-04:00The book clearly marks off the closing remarks of ...The book clearly marks off the closing remarks of John Robbins from the point where Dr. Clark left off. And it should be noted that Dr. Clark's commentary on Colossians clearly upholds the view espoused in the Definition of Chalcedon.Charlie J. Rayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18185331029930925967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-16155348469785854352012-08-31T19:46:48.965-04:002012-08-31T19:46:48.965-04:00Dr. John Robbins finished the book Incarnation for...Dr. John Robbins finished the book Incarnation for Dr. Clark so I was told by my father-in-law who took some of Dr. Clark's courses. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01373110714646469135noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-13596085721537044412012-08-31T19:40:23.865-04:002012-08-31T19:40:23.865-04:00Just FYI I have heard that Dr. John Robbins finish...Just FYI I have heard that Dr. John Robbins finished the book Incarnation for Clark. Has anyone else heard this? My source is credible. I wanted to share the info anyways.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01373110714646469135noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-30110304638699221762012-08-31T19:39:10.631-04:002012-08-31T19:39:10.631-04:00Just FYI I have heard that Dr. John Robbins finish...Just FYI I have heard that Dr. John Robbins finished the book Incarnation for Clark. Has anyone else heard this? My source is credible. I wanted to share the info anyways.<br /><br />Jaime RodriguezAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01373110714646469135noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-29324930100754047192012-03-14T08:20:37.530-04:002012-03-14T08:20:37.530-04:00The dual procession of the Spirit from both the Fa...The dual procession of the Spirit from both the Father and the Son does not teach ditheism any more than it teaches tritheism. It's a matter of the divine economy within the one nature or being of the Godhead. The procession of the Spirit is an eternal procession with no beginning in time. Therefore, the theology of a dual procession is not semi-sabellian just as the Eastern Orthodox view Charlie J. Rayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18185331029930925967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-76974116957006773262010-08-29T22:31:36.724-04:002010-08-29T22:31:36.724-04:00Gordon H. Clark denied the Chalcedonian Creed 451 ...Gordon H. Clark denied the Chalcedonian Creed 451 and said that Christ is two persons, one human and the other divine. It's clearly Nestorianism.<br /><br />Regarding the Filioque controversy, you're reading way too much into the Western view. The Western view seeks to preserve the equality of all three persons of the Godhead. They are all equally eternal as the Athanasian Creed puts Charlie J. Rayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18185331029930925967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-40901784555110080572010-08-29T20:01:29.487-04:002010-08-29T20:01:29.487-04:00It seems you view Gordon H. Clark as Nestorian. N...It seems you view Gordon H. Clark as Nestorian. Nestorianism is not the only possible heresy. The Westminster Confession of Faith itself is heretical. It contradicts John 15:26. It preaches semi-Sabellianism, which is what the Filioque heresy is. The Westminster Confession of Faith preaches the heresy that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father "AND THE SON" (FILIOQUE), and the Scott R. Harringtonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-75541571045382941342010-04-27T07:52:58.884-04:002010-04-27T07:52:58.884-04:00Thanks, Ken. I think even Arminians can recognize...Thanks, Ken. I think even Arminians can recognize this heresy easily.Charlie J. Rayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18185331029930925967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-31402519071114558902010-04-27T01:26:07.391-04:002010-04-27T01:26:07.391-04:00I only managed to skim this, but it's a decent...I only managed to skim this, but it's a decent analysis. Clark's Nestorianism is fairly apparent, and his free redefinitions of terms actually hurts his credibility, as he seems unable or unwilling to deal with Orthodox Christology on its own terms.あじhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14379388427897061674noreply@blogger.com