tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post5248071982795650390..comments2024-03-27T20:28:38.015-04:00Comments on Reasonable Christian: Charles Hodge Rebukes Mike Horton On InspirationCharlie J. Rayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18185331029930925967noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-44901816067411288192012-03-27T16:30:19.595-04:002012-03-27T16:30:19.595-04:00My point is that Horton is hiding behind Hodge and...My point is that Horton is hiding behind Hodge and others to promote what is essentially a postmodernist and semi-neo-orthodox theology of Scripture.Charlie J. Rayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18185331029930925967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-53764478746509038482012-03-27T16:28:49.356-04:002012-03-27T16:28:49.356-04:00Hudson, Mike Horton is a Van Tilian, meaning that ...Hudson, Mike Horton is a Van Tilian, meaning that he does not accept that the Bible is propositional truth in any meaningful sense. He adopts the neo-orthodox theory of Scripture as merely a metaphor or an inspired but factual myth. He hides behind the theory of analogy to do so but anyone who has read Carl F. H. Henry or Gordon H. Clark can spot compromise on this issue a mile away. <br /><brCharlie J. Rayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18185331029930925967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-6813243356406301242012-03-27T15:54:00.365-04:002012-03-27T15:54:00.365-04:00Charlie.
I don't read the last line of Hort...Charlie. <br /><br />I don't read the last line of Horton's statement as saying what you think it says. I see him saying that Scripture consists of only ("reduced to") propositions. If there are suppositions, then the Bible's claim to inspiration is arbitrary and confused, which clearly is not the case.<br /><br />It seems to me that <br /><br />1. All Biblical narrative Hudsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05511526445868840330noreply@blogger.com