tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post3083163156040086391..comments2024-03-27T20:28:38.015-04:00Comments on Reasonable Christian: A Case Study in Theology and Philosophy: Alvin Plantinga, His Followers, and His ProposalsCharlie J. Rayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18185331029930925967noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-74306243059634251482010-12-09T09:12:57.451-05:002010-12-09T09:12:57.451-05:00Oh, and Clark did not accept evidential or empiric...Oh, and Clark did not accept evidential or empirical arguments for God's existence whatsoever. The same cannot be said of Van Til, who still allowed for the classical arguments.Charlie J. Rayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18185331029930925967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-82659400123516397542010-12-09T09:11:32.274-05:002010-12-09T09:11:32.274-05:00One might note here that Gordon H. Clark's emp...One might note here that Gordon H. Clark's emphasis on logic as a basis for apologetics is presuppositional and begins with Scripture, since that is how God has revealed Himself to us. Van Til, on the other hand, has embraced an Evangelical form of neo-orthodoxy and "paradox". While I have seen problems with both Van Til and Clark, ultimately I believe Clark's approach has Charlie J. Rayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18185331029930925967noreply@blogger.com