tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post5413274212399044208..comments2024-03-27T20:28:38.015-04:00Comments on Reasonable Christian: The Noetic Effects of Sin: Subjectivity and Objectivity in Telling History: A Response to Carl Trueman's Interview on the Reformed ForumCharlie J. Rayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18185331029930925967noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-52882246403064029482016-09-10T23:30:10.048-04:002016-09-10T23:30:10.048-04:00That's too bad because your view would mean th...That's too bad because your view would mean that the eternal Logos or Second Person of the Trinity replaced the human soul of Christ. That's a heresy known as Apollinarianism. I disagree with Broughton Knox's view on the atonement because he was essentially an Amyraldian, though his son, David Knox assures me that his father was a 4.5 point Calvinist. I don't know how he can Charlie J. Rayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18185331029930925967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-29579225380965893552016-09-05T20:06:25.745-04:002016-09-05T20:06:25.745-04:00I read Broughton Knox many years ago.
In the fir...I read Broughton Knox many years ago. <br /><br />In the first volume of his selected works published by Matthias Media, he said something to the effect that Christ the eternal Son of God, in the Incarnation, joined himself to the earthly person of Jesus of Nazareth. <br /><br />At that point, I closed the book and burned it, and have never read another sentence he wrote.Mikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08247094702054398126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-69065480964753719372011-02-05T18:51:46.598-05:002011-02-05T18:51:46.598-05:00I have to disagree with Muller, however when he sa...I have to disagree with Muller, however when he says that Calvin never addressed universal atonement:<br /><br /><i>More simply put, was the value of<br />Christ’s death such that, it would be sufficient for all sin if God had so intended —<br />or was the value of Christ’s death such that if all would believe all would be saved.<br />On this very specific question Calvin is, arguably, silent. HeCharlie J. Rayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18185331029930925967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-8204396556253649452011-02-05T18:45:26.010-05:002011-02-05T18:45:26.010-05:00Any other suggestions or criticism is welcomed.Any other suggestions or criticism is welcomed.Charlie J. Rayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18185331029930925967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15388492.post-65192277009693093612011-02-05T18:45:04.704-05:002011-02-05T18:45:04.704-05:00Due to an e-mail sent to me by Dr. Clark I have co...Due to an e-mail sent to me by Dr. Clark I have corrected the text to reflect that Muller writes against the "Calvin versus Calvinism" school of thought.Charlie J. Rayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18185331029930925967noreply@blogger.com