The following article is by Daniel Chew, a student at Westminster Seminary California. I found his paper on the issue of empirical science online. His critique and examination of Thomas Kuhn's philosophy of science is notable and worth a careful reading. He also mentions Gordon H. Clark's critique of the deductive method as being subjective and biased.
You can click here to read the article: Science As Paradigmatic
Also, you can read Daniel's blog at: Daniel's Place - (Reformata et semper reformanda)
You can click here to read the article: Science As Paradigmatic
Also, you can read Daniel's blog at: Daniel's Place - (Reformata et semper reformanda)
No comments:
Post a Comment
No anonymous comments. Your comments may or may not be posted if you insist on not standing by your words with your real identification.