Reasonable Christian: Is the Doctrine of Common Grace Reformed? An Audio Debate Between Richard J. Mouw and David Engelsma

This debate clearly shows why Richard J. Mouw's view denies classical Calvinism and affirms what can only be called a tendency toward theological liberalism. After all, if the three points of common grace are true, it would imply that general and natural revelation trumps the special revelation of Scripture. It would follow therefore that science can tell us that homosexuality is not wrong but is rather inborn and benign. How science can judge the ethical values of the moral law of God is never explained by proponents of the doctrines of common grace, however.

Click here to hear the debate and/or read the transcipt:  Reasonable Christian: Is the Doctrine of Common Grace Reformed? An Audio Debate Between Richard J. Mouw and David Engelsma