The following is a response by the Daniel's Place blog:
You can read the entire article at this link:
The core problem with Turk is his view of the Gospel. Classical Reformed orthodoxy teaches that the Gospel is good news period. The Gospel is proclaimed to sinners of what Christ has done for them. Over and over, the Scriptures starts with proclaiming the Gospel, and then proclaim the law (in its third use) as how we ought to live in light of the Gospel. In epistles like Romans, the model is Law (first use), then Gospel, then Law (third use).
According to Turk, the Gospel must be seen as something that God has done for us which results in "the advantages of declared righteousness". Therefore, the Gospel itself is transformative. Whereas the Reformed position is that the Gospel is declarative, Turk and I suspect many Evangelicals think of the Gospel as transformative. Therefore, it is the Gospel that must transform lives, which brings us to the next point.
You can read the entire article at this link:
Daniel's Place - (Reformata et semper reformanda): A Response to Frank Turk's Open Letter
2 comments:
Good on, Charlie.
Jack
Yes, I thought that one was well written... God bless...
Post a Comment