It would appear that the Fellowship of Confessing Anglicans, the Jerusalem Declaration, and the Goals of the Fellowship of Confessing Anglicans is a controversial issue over at Anglican Forums, Anglican.net. Anyone who happens to disagree with the liberal biases of the incognito Admin, a faceless person who does not identify his or her qualifications to judge theological and biblical issues, is censored from saying anything, quoting Scripture, or quoting from confessional statements, etc. What is worse, there are no formal rules written for anyone to see what is or is not off-topic. What is considered off-topic is random and arbitrary at the discretion of the Admin.
Usually, the administrators of these forums have little to no knowledge of Scripture, the creeds, confessions, formularies or anything else. That's why I find it to be frustrating to participate in groups where there dictatorial powers given to the administrators without any clearly defined parameters, rules, or any other guidelines.
The blatant hypocrisy of the Anglican Forums is such that one poster, namely one "historyb", had a tag line that said, "Calvinism is heresy." When I complained the Admin promptly reprimanded the poster who then changed his tag line to "Calvinism is 'reprehensible'." As if that is a significant change? The Admin then replied when I complained: "He changed the word from 'heresy' to 'reprehensible'."
Duplicity reigns.
This is why I usually stick to blogging. It is also why I started my own discussion group at Facebook called "Reformed Anglicans for Scripturalism." I will not be participating any further at Anglican Forums since it is obvious that I will be muzzled and censored from saying anything that the administrator disagrees with.
This is why I usually stick to blogging. It is also why I started my own discussion group at Facebook called "Reformed Anglicans for Scripturalism." I will not be participating any further at Anglican Forums since it is obvious that I will be muzzled and censored from saying anything that the administrator disagrees with.