Do you believe for one moment if John McCain or Sarah Palin had absolutely any connection whatsoever with a racist nationalist movement that the political left would ignore it or ask us to pretend it did not exist? Yet, as the facts stand, Senator Barack Obama, despite his denials to the contrary, has politcal connections to the Nation of Islam. Where there is a smoking gun there is evidence the gun was shot.
Where does the trail lead? Despite Senator Obama's denials, the fact that he had a close relationship with Reverend Jeremiah Wright and the United Church of Christ, where he was a member for over ten years, shows that Obama sat under this sort of racist ranting without leaving the church. If Obama was offended by the racist remarks of Jeremiah Wright, why did not Obama leave the church way before he ran for President of the United States?
How could Obama not see that some of Rev. Wright's remarks came directly from Louis Farrakhan, especially the idea that the U.S. government was somehow responsible for spreading AIDS in the black communities in order to exterminate the black race? How ridiculous is this charge? It has absolutely no basis in fact and seems to be a symptom of paranoia.
The Democrats have a double standard here. If McCain had connections to the KKK or any other white "nationalist" group, he would be immediately attacked, and rightly so, as being a closet racist. However, Obama can have Nation of Islam advisors like Cynthia K. Miller and Jennifer Mason without any fear of political retribution just by virtue of the fact that he is black and a Democrat. Another questionable connection that the liberal media outlets will not inform you about is the connection that Tony Rezko, with whom Barack Obama has had a questionable relationship, was also in partnership with Elijah Muhammed's son, Jabir. (Elijah Muhammed, now deceased, was the founder of the Nation of Islam in Chicago).
Also, Louis Farrakhan has a mansion in Barack Obama's district and this is openly Nation of Islam territory and many observers say that Obama could not have a chance of winning election without the approval of the Nation of Islam. Put this together with the fact that Jeremiah Wright and his church, part of the United Churches of Chirst, gave Louis Farrakhan a lifetime achievement award and what do you get? You get a political candidate named Barack Obama who is politically indebted to a black nationalist and racist organization which teaches that white people are devils and that the U.S. government and Jews are out to exterminate black people.
You figure it out. Is there a double standard among Democrats or not? How can ABC, CBS, and NBC ignore the evidence and the obvious connection between Obama, his church, and the Nation of Islam? I can only conclude that the New York Times and these other "liberal" media outlets are so biased that they have become merely organs of propaganda rather than truly objective sources of news. When facts like Obama's connection to the Nation of Islam is completely ignored because of a political agenda of liberal media then one can only conclude that the truth is irrelevant to them so long as their agenda is further promoted. What is the difference between this sort of propaganda and the propaganda of Nazism or Communism? None!
The Democratic Party has not only appropriated a pro-death policy for unborn children but now it has revealed that it is willing to nominate a black man with known connections to black racism. How can anyone with a conscience fail to see this is wrong?
Where does the trail lead? Despite Senator Obama's denials, the fact that he had a close relationship with Reverend Jeremiah Wright and the United Church of Christ, where he was a member for over ten years, shows that Obama sat under this sort of racist ranting without leaving the church. If Obama was offended by the racist remarks of Jeremiah Wright, why did not Obama leave the church way before he ran for President of the United States?
How could Obama not see that some of Rev. Wright's remarks came directly from Louis Farrakhan, especially the idea that the U.S. government was somehow responsible for spreading AIDS in the black communities in order to exterminate the black race? How ridiculous is this charge? It has absolutely no basis in fact and seems to be a symptom of paranoia.
The Democrats have a double standard here. If McCain had connections to the KKK or any other white "nationalist" group, he would be immediately attacked, and rightly so, as being a closet racist. However, Obama can have Nation of Islam advisors like Cynthia K. Miller and Jennifer Mason without any fear of political retribution just by virtue of the fact that he is black and a Democrat. Another questionable connection that the liberal media outlets will not inform you about is the connection that Tony Rezko, with whom Barack Obama has had a questionable relationship, was also in partnership with Elijah Muhammed's son, Jabir. (Elijah Muhammed, now deceased, was the founder of the Nation of Islam in Chicago).
Also, Louis Farrakhan has a mansion in Barack Obama's district and this is openly Nation of Islam territory and many observers say that Obama could not have a chance of winning election without the approval of the Nation of Islam. Put this together with the fact that Jeremiah Wright and his church, part of the United Churches of Chirst, gave Louis Farrakhan a lifetime achievement award and what do you get? You get a political candidate named Barack Obama who is politically indebted to a black nationalist and racist organization which teaches that white people are devils and that the U.S. government and Jews are out to exterminate black people.
You figure it out. Is there a double standard among Democrats or not? How can ABC, CBS, and NBC ignore the evidence and the obvious connection between Obama, his church, and the Nation of Islam? I can only conclude that the New York Times and these other "liberal" media outlets are so biased that they have become merely organs of propaganda rather than truly objective sources of news. When facts like Obama's connection to the Nation of Islam is completely ignored because of a political agenda of liberal media then one can only conclude that the truth is irrelevant to them so long as their agenda is further promoted. What is the difference between this sort of propaganda and the propaganda of Nazism or Communism? None!
The Democratic Party has not only appropriated a pro-death policy for unborn children but now it has revealed that it is willing to nominate a black man with known connections to black racism. How can anyone with a conscience fail to see this is wrong?
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment