John Calvin's Commentary on Galatians 5:6
But
faith, which worketh by love. The contrast
here introduced, between ceremonies and the exercise of love, was intended to
prevent the Jews from thinking too highly of themselves, and imagining that they
were entitled to some superiority; for towards the close of the Epistle, instead
of this clause, he uses the words, a new creature. (Galatians 6:15). As if he had said,
Ceremonies are no longer enjoined by Divine authority; and, if we abound in the
exercise of love, all is well. Meanwhile, this does not set aside our
sacraments, which are aids to faith but is merely a short announcement of what
he had formerly taught as to the spiritual worship of God.
There
would be no difficulty in this passage, were it not for the dishonest manner in
which it has been tortured by the Papists to uphold the righteousness of works.
When they attempt to refute our doctrine, that we are justified by faith alone,
they take this line of argument. If the faith which justifies us be that "which
worketh by love," then faith alone does not justify. I answer, they do not
comprehend their own silly talk; still less do they comprehend our statements.
It is not our doctrine that the faith which justifies is alone; we maintain that
it is invariably accompanied by good works; only we contend that faith alone is
sufficient for justification. The Papists themselves are accustomed to tear
faith after a murderous fashion, sometimes presenting it out of all shape and
unaccompanied by love, and at other times, in its true character. We, again,
refuse to admit that, in any case, faith can be separated from the Spirit of
regeneration; but when the question comes to be in what manner we are justified,
we then set aside all works.
With
respect to the present passage, Paul enters into no dispute whether love
cooperates with faith in justification; but, in order to avoid the appearance of
representing Christians as idle and as resembling blocks of wood, he points out
what are the true exercises of believers. When you are engaged in discussing the
question of justification, beware of allowing any mention to be made of love or
of works, but resolutely adhere to the exclusive particle. Paul does not here
treat of justification, or assign any part of the praise of it to love. Had he
done so, the same argument would prove that circumcision and ceremonies, at a
former period, had some share in justifying a sinner. As in Christ Jesus he
commends faith accompanied by love, so before the coming of Christ ceremonies
were required. But this has nothing to do with obtaining righteousness, as the
Papists themselves allow; and neither must it be supposed that love possesses
any such influence.
No comments:
Post a Comment