>

Martyred for the Gospel

Martyred for the Gospel
The burning of Tharchbishop of Cant. D. Tho. Cranmer in the town dich at Oxford, with his hand first thrust into the fyre, wherwith he subscribed before. [Click on the picture to see Cranmer's last words.]

Daily Bible Verse

Showing posts with label Particular Atonement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Particular Atonement. Show all posts

Saturday, May 10, 2014

Christ Died for You?

I recently engaged a modernist Lutheran in an online debate on Facebook.  He continually denied logic and then contradicted himself by asserting the proposition that Calvinists cannot say that, "Christ died for you."  Although no one can absolutely or intuitively know anything directly, the Calvinist can be assured of his salvation, and hence the Calvinist can know indirectly that he or she is one of God's elect.  Only God knows intuitively and directly.  He is eternally omniscient and there is no procession of thoughts from one thought to another in God's mind.  We, on the other hand, know only discursively.


Of course, stubborn irrationalists are not interested in the confessional standards of Calvinists.  Their responses are designed only to preach to the choir, i.e. other Melanchthonian Lutherans.  Phillip Melanchthon, you will recall, went back in a semi-pelagian direction.  Be that as it may, the Dutch Reformed confessional standards, the Three Forms of Unity (Belgic Confession, Heidelberg Catechism, and the Canons of Dort) do answer the question the Lutheran thinks refutes the Calvinist focus on the sovereignty of God in the ordo  salutis.  The Heidelberg Confession in particular deals with this question directly on Day 1.  What is particularly interesting about this catechism question and answer is that it ties both the sovereignty of God and particular atonement together and applies that doctrine directly to the individual believer personally such that the believer can truly say, "Christ died for me!"  The Lutheran cannot say this with a straight face for the simple reason that Christ did not die for him personally.  Christ only died for him generally.  The Heidelberg Catechism says:

LORD'S DAY 1

Question 1. What is thy only comfort in life and death?

Answer: That I with (1)body and soul, both in life and death, (2)am not my own, but belong (3)unto my faithful Savior Jesus Christ; who, with His precious (4)blood, hath fully (5)satisfied for all my sins, and delivered 6me from all the power of the devil; and so preserves me (7)that without the will of my heavenly Father, not a hair (8)can fall from my head; yea, that all things must be (9)subservient to my salvation, and therefore, by His Holy Spirit, He also assures me (10)of eternal life, and makes (11)me sincerely willing and ready, henceforth, to live unto Him.


1) 1 Cor. 6:19-20; 2) Rom. 14:7-9; 3) 1 Cor. 3:23; 4) 1 Pet. 1:18-19; 5) John 1:7; 6) 1 John 3:8; Heb. 2:14-15; 7) John 6:39; John 10:28-29; 8) Luke 21:18; Matt. 10:30; 9) Rom. 8:28; 10) 2 Cor. 1:22; 2 Cor. 5:5; 11) Rom. 8:14; Rom. 7:22


The Arminian and the Lutheran cannot say that Christ died for "you" personally.  Why?  Because they do not really believe that.  If universal atonement is true, then it logically follows that Christ died for everyone in general, not for you personally.  And, if Christ died for everybody, his death effects no genuine salvation for everyone.  Salvation is merely a contingency, a possibility.  Thus, the death of Christ is not what ultimately saves in the Arminian/Lutheran scheme.  What saves is you yourself and your response to the proposition that Christ died for everyone.  If Christ died for everyone, he died for everyone already in hell since the fall, for everyone in hell while He was hanging on the cross, and for everyone who would go to hell in the future.  Therefore, the death of Christ on the cross is not the central doctrine of Arminianism/Lutheranism.  For the Arminian the central doctrine is libertarian free will.  For modernist and irrationalist Lutherans, the central doctrine is sacramentalism.

The Calvinist places neither of these doctrines at front and center.  For the Calvinist the sovereignty of God determines salvation.  (Psalm 139:1-16).  Not only does Christ die for all of the elect, but He knows each of them personally from all eternity, before any of them were ever born.  He died for His sheep.  (John 10:11, 15).  His sheep were given to Him by the Father in eternity before creation.  (John 10:27-30); Matthew 25:33-34).  Jesus calls each of His sheep by name.  (John 10:3).  They are not faceless numbers in a crowd.  They are not merely "possible" converts.  (Proverbs 16:33).  Every single one of Christ's sheep will believe and be saved.  (John 10:4-5, 28).  His sheep come to know Him through regeneration, effectual calling, conversion, repentance, adoption, inheritance, and the the grace of faith.  They are predestined to believe.  (Romans 8:28-30).  Salvation is 100% guaranteed.  Salvation is not a crapshoot.  (Proverbs 16:33).

Charlie J. Ray

 When he has brought all his own outside, he goes ahead of them. The sheep follow him because they recognize his voice. 5 They will never follow a stranger; instead they will run away from him, because they don't recognize the voice of strangers." (John 10:4-5 CSB)

 "I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep. (John 10:11 CSB)

 "I am the good shepherd. I know My own sheep, and they know Me, 15 as the Father knows Me, and I know the Father. I lay down My life for the sheep. 16 But I have other sheep that are not of this fold; I must bring them also, and they will listen to My voice. Then there will be one flock, one shepherd. (John 10:14-16 CSB)

 Then the Jews surrounded Him and asked, "How long are You going to keep us in suspense? If You are the Messiah, tell us plainly." 25 "I did tell you and you don't believe," Jesus answered them. "The works that I do in My Father's name testify about Me. 26 But you don't believe because you are not My sheep. 27 My sheep hear My voice, I know them, and they follow Me. 28 I give them eternal life, and they will never perish-- ever! No one will snatch them out of My hand. 29 My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all. No one is able to snatch them out of the Father's hand. 30 The Father and I are one." (John 10:24-30 CSB)

Holman Christian Standard Bible, 2nd Edition.



Sunday, June 24, 2012

Question and Answer: Amyraldianism, Common Grace, and the Well Meant Offer

The following is a question someone asked online and my response:

Question:  Not just the idea of common grace, but also the "well meant offer".  Just wondering if it is fair to label both the Van Tillians as well as the New-Calvinists like Mark Driscoll, D. A. Carson and Tim Keller, Amyraldians. And yes. Although many people separate Van Til's theology with Neo-orthodoxy, I actually don't see much difference in their epistemology. Maybe Barth is even more logically in comparison to Clark.

The above question was asked in response to this post on the blog:  Evidence: Common Grace Undermines Particular Atonement

Here is my response to the question above:

Answer:  I wouldn't call D.A. Carson an Amyraldian... At least not that I know of. Maybe I missed something. But Mark Driscoll makes no bones about it that he believes in universal atonement. Once you give up one point of Calvinism the rest collapses soon enough. Tim Keller is not an Amyraldian either. But my contention is that those who hold to common grace usually agree with Charles Hodge that Christ "in some sense" died for the reprobate in order to purchase for them "common grace". This usually degenerates into the well meant offer and other such semi-Arminian nonsense. Neo-Calvinists are inconsistent Calvinists in other words. Mike Horton's new systematic theology is alarming because instead of denying several points of orthodoxy he only questions one or two points. As Gordon H. Clark says, an Evangelical who is liberal and doesn't want to reveal it just yet only compromises a point here or there. But he is a liberal nevertheless.

I guess "semi-Amyraldian" would be a good way to put Charles Hodge's capituation to common grace being purchased on the cross.

Question:   Well... the contention among the amyraldians is that there are two contradicting wills of God. That God desires the salvation of all, but only died for some. Doesn't Keller, Carson, Driscoll and Piper all agree with that?

Answer:  This is a fine point but the basic difference is that Driscoll openly advocates 4 point Calvinism and is openly an Amyraldian.

As far as I know Keller, Carson, and Piper are 5 point Calvinists. The reason Carson, Keller, and Piper say that God "desires" the salvation of all is His revealed will shows that He wants all men to repent. Horton has that view as well. It goes back to common grace and the well meant offer. Although none of these men "claim" to advocate Amyraldianism or Arminianism the fact is the doctrine of common grace and the well meant offer are very subtle compromises with both Arminianism and Amyraldianism.

Amyraldianism says that God decreed that Christ would die for all men "on the condition of faith" but knowing that all men would not accept Christ God then decreed to unconditionally elect some men. That's basically a compromise with Arminianism but does not go as far as Arminianism. It is a departure from infralapsarianism in that there is a logical contradiction in God's will. How could God decree to save all on condition of faith when obviously God already knows the future because He has determined every detail of the future? At least infralapsarianism says that in the LOGICAL order of God's thinking prior to creation or time He determined to elect some men unconditionally. He made this logical decision after considering men fallen in Adam in the logical order of His decrees. Again, this is not in time but before time or creation and takes place in God's thought. How modern neo-Calvinists can denigrate univocal knowledge when the entire supralapsarian/infralapsarian issue was in fact an argument about the logical order of God's thoughts when He decided to make His decrees. According to the liberals like Horton and R. Scott Clark this is to confuse the Creator/creature distinction. For them analogical theology would mean we could not even discuss supralapsarianism, infralapsarianism, or even Amyraldianism because this is prying into God's secret being. What a bunch of self-contradictory morons!

Sorry for that last bit but I get upset when so-called "Evangelical" men have sold out a couple of points to the liberals while pretending to be still conservative and Evangelical. According to Gordon H. Clark these kind of men are not conservatives at all but liberals. Personally, I think Clark was talking obliquely about Cornelius Van Til, Ned Stonehouse, John Murray and others. Maybe even John Frame?

If you read the piece I wrote on Charles Hodge saying that Christ died to purchase common grace for the reprobate (all men would include the reprobate), then you can see how advocating common grace rather than Calvin's doctrine of general providence leads to further compromise in other areas. It's also why Princeton today is a liberal seminary and the PCUSA is basically a liberal denomination. They even ordain open homosexuals now. After all common grace elevates general revelation to the same level as special revelation. Once that happens theistic evolution creeps in and the next thing is the ordination of women and homosexuals.

This is why I have now been convinced that Gordon H. Clark was correct in his axiom: Scripture IS the Word of God.


The Protestant Reformed Church has done a thorough critique of both common grace and the well meant offer. I would highly recommend that you do some reading on their websites. They have shown a direct link between the teaching of theistic evolution at Calvin College and Seminary and the doctrine of the three points of common grace. Common grace and Arminianism lead to liberalism.

Sincerely yours in Christ,

Charlie


Addendum:  The fact of the matter is that common grace confuses the command given to all men to repent of self righteousness and sin and to believe the Gospel promises with some sort of "well meant offer".  Like the Arminian, neo-Calvinists confuse the perspective of the creature with God's secret decrees.  God obviously never desired the salvation of the reprobate.  To make God's revealed will the litmus test over against God's decrees is to sell out to Arminianism.  Ironically, even the revealed will of God (Deuteronomy 29:29) is not to save all since God is speaking specifically to the Hebrews when He says it is not His pleasure that the wicked perish (Ezekiel 33:11).  The other proof text misappropriated by the Arminians, Amyraldians and neo-Calvinists is 2 Peter 3:9.  The context of that verse is not all mankind in general but Christians suffering persecution by the Romans.  The letter is specially addressed to Christians and is considered an occasional pastoral epistle dealing with a specific situation.  To read into the text of 2 Peter 3:9 a "well meant desire" on God's part to save those He has decreed to reprobation and hell is illogical, irrational, and a flat contradiction of the total teaching of Scripture.  (1 Peter 2:8; Romans 9:11-13).

I offer this as proof that Driscoll teaches the Arminian or Amyraldian view:

 Though by his own admission he doesn’t appreciate the title, Mark Driscoll is held up by many as the poster-child for what is being called New Calvinism or Neo-Calvinism, and his view on the atonement which he terms Unlimited-Limited Atonement is increasingly becoming a predominant view of the atonement held by young Reformed Christians.  In explaining Unlimited-Limited Atonement Driscoll writes:

“At first glance, Unlimited and Limited Atonement are in opposition. But, that dilemma is resolved by noting two things. First, the two categories are not mutually exclusive; since Jesus died for the sins of everyone that means that He also died for the sins of the elect. Second, Jesus’ death for all people does not accomplish the same thing as His death for the elect. This point is complicated, but is in fact taught in Scripture (1 Tim. 4:10; 2 Peter 2:1).
Simply, by dying for everyone, Jesus purchased everyone as His possession and He then applies His forgiveness to the elect by grace and applies His wrath to the non-elect. Objectively, Jesus’ death was sufficient to save anyone, and, subjectively, only efficient to save those who repent of their sin and trust in Him. This position is called Unlimited Limited Atonement or Modified Calvinism.
Therefore, Modified Calvinists like the Mars Hill elders do not believe anything different than Arminians; we simply believe what they believe and more. Lastly, perhaps the Old Testament sacrificial system provides the best illustration of this both/and position. The High Priest would offer a sacrifice for the sins of the whole nation on the Day of Atonement; this is, in effect, unlimited atonement. Then, each worshipper would repent of their own sins as demonstrated by the giving of their own sacrifices for their sins; this is, in effect, limited atonement.”[19]
From:  Soteriology in the Middle (Part III), by Kellen Criswell.
You can also hear it from the horse's mouth so to speak.  Driscoll preached on unlimited atonement here:  Unlimited Limited Atonement.

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

The Damnable Heresy of Arminianism

But we who believe the true gospel know that this issue lies at the heart of Christianity. The doctrines of grace are the basics of the Christian faith, not some higher theology that only seminarians are able to understand. It is a life and death issue; for if one is an Arminian, he is dead in his sins.  

--Outside the Camp....



{This article was written in 2012.  While my view has changed, I am leaving this in place because the criticisms of Arminianism are still valid.  I no longer believe that all Arminians are lost.  But it should be noted that even Gordon H. Clark said that if certain Arminians cross over into Pelagianism, that is a heresy that would be excluding from biblical Christianity.  I would add neo-orthodoxy and open theism and theological liberalism to that list of heresies.  Charlie J. Ray.  October 3, 2024.}


I generally do not agree with some of the extreme positions taken on the Outside the Camp website. However, the following article regarding Arminianism expresses my own view of the matter. Since Arminianism directly contradicts the Gospel on every point of the five points of the Remonstrandts, then it is difficult to see how anyone could be saved under that system of doctrine. Here is the article in its entirety: 


Is Arminianism a damnable heresy? Most people who say they believe the doctrines of grace would agree that Arminianism is a theological error. But as soon as one throws in the word "heresy," the number of people who would go that far drops off quite a bit. When one goes so far as to say that Arminianism is a damnable heresy (thus saying that all who believe in Arminianism are unregenerate), then the number of people who agree is narrowed to a very few. In fact, the "tolerant sovereign-gracers" would call such a person an unloving, divisive schismatic who is arguing over minute and complex theological issues. Believing the doctrines of grace is just part of their "tradition" or "heritage." Oh, the doctrines of grace are "precious truths," but they are not essential to Christianity; they are merely a "more Biblical perspective." Arminians are seen to be just "happily inconsistent" Christians who "just need a little different emphasis in their theology." Calling Arminians unregenerate is almost unheard of.

But we who believe the true gospel know that this issue lies at the heart of Christianity. The doctrines of grace are the basics of the Christian faith, not some higher theology that only seminarians are able to understand. It is a life and death issue; for if one is an Arminian, he is dead in his sins. It is an issue of truth versus lies; an issue of the true gospel versus another gospel; an issue of the true God versus a false god. In fact, the doctrines of grace are what differentiate Christianity from every other false religion.

What do Arminians believe?

(1) Arminians believe that, although God is the creator of the universe, He did not decree everything that comes to pass. This includes the belief that God did not choose before the foundation of the earth who would be saved and who would be damned. Instead, they say that God saw what would happen in the future and made His determinations based on what human beings did. 

What does the Scripture say about God's decree and control of everything that comes to pass?

"See now that I, I [am] He, and there [is] no other God with Me. I kill, and I keep alive. I wound and I heal, and there [is] no deliverer from My hand" (Deuteronomy 32:39). "Jehovah kills and keeps alive; He brings down and causes to go to Sheol. Jehovah brings down, and He gives riches; He brings low; yea, He lifts up high. He raises the poor from the dust; He lifts up the needy from the dunghill, to cause [them] to sit with nobles; yea, He causes them to inherit a throne of honor; for to Jehovah [are] the pillars of the earth; and He sets the habitable world on them" (1 Samuel 2:6-8). "Behold, He breaks down, and no one builds; He shuts against a man, and no one opens. Behold, He holds back the waters, and they dry up; and He sends them out, and they overflow the earth. With Him [is] strength and sound wisdom; the deceived and the deceiver are His. He causes wise men to go stripped; and He makes judges fools. He loosens the bonds of kings, and He binds their loins with a girdle; making priests walk [away] stripped; and He overthrows the mighty; turning aside the lip of the trusted men; and He takes away the reason of the aged. He pours scorn on nobles, and He loosens the girdle of the mighty; revealing deep things out of darkness; and He brings the shadow of death to light. He gives greatness to the nations, and He destroys them; spreading out the nations, and He leads them out. He takes away the heart of the heads of the people of the land; and He causes them to wander in a waste [in which is] no path. They grope in the dark, and [there] is no light; and He makes them stagger like a drunkard" (Job 12:14-25). "But He [is] in one [mind], and who can turn Him? Yea, His soul desires, and He does [it]. For He fulfilled my lot, and many like these are with Him" (Job 23:13-14). "But our God [is] in Heaven; He has done all that He has pleased" (Psalm 115:3). "For I know that Jehovah [is] great, and our Lord [is] above all gods. Every [thing] which Jehovah [was] pleased to do, He did, in the heavens and in the earth, and in the seas and all deep places. He causes the vapors to rise from the end of the earth; He makes lightnings for the rain; He brings the wind out of His storehouses" (Psalm 135:5-7). "The lot is cast into the lap, but all ordering of it [is] from Jehovah" (Proverbs 16:33). "[As] streams of waters, the king's heart [is] in the hand of Jehovah; He turns it wherever He desires" (Proverbs 21:1). "Have you not known? Have you not heard? Was it not told to you from the beginning? Did you not discern [from] the foundations of the earth? He who sits on the circle of the earth, even those living in it are like grasshoppers; He who stretches the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to live in; who gives potentates into nothing. He makes judges of the earth as nothing. Yea, they shall not be planted; yea, they are not sown; yea, their stem [is] not taking root in the earth. And He shall also blow on them, and they shall wither, and the tempest shall lift them up like stubble. To whom then will you compare Me, or [am] I equaled, says the Holy One? Lift up your eyes on high and look: Who has created these? Who brings out their host by number? By greatness of vigor, and might of power, He calls them all by names; not one is lacking" (Isaiah 40:21-26). "Behold, the former things have come to pass, and I declare new things before they happen, I cause you to hear" (Isaiah 42:9). "I [am] Jehovah, and [there is] none else; there is no God except Me. I will clothe you, though you do not know Me, that they may know from the rising of the sun, and to its going down, that [there is] none besides Me; I [am] Jehovah, and there is none else; forming light, and creating darkness; making peace, and creating evil. I, Jehovah, do all these things" (Isaiah 45:5-7). "Remember former things from forever, for I [am] God, and no one else [is] God, even none like Me, declaring the end from the beginning, and from the past those things which were not done, saying, My counsel shall rise; and, I will do all My desire; calling a bird of prey from the east, the man of My counsel from a far off land. Yes, I have spoken; yes, I will cause it to come; I have formed; yes, I will do it" (Isaiah 46:9-11). "O house of Israel, can I not do to you as this potter? says Jehovah. Behold, as the clay in the potter's hand, [so are] you in My hand, O house of Israel" (Jeremiah 18:6). "Who [is] this speaking, and it happens [when] the Lord does not command it?" (Lamentations 3:37). "And all the trees of the field shall know that I, Jehovah, have brought down the high tree [and] have exalted the low tree, [and] have dried up the green tree, and have made the dry tree flourish. I, Jehovah, have spoken and acted" (Ezekiel 17:24).
 
Is a god who does not control all of his creation the God of Holy Scripture? And if it is not the God of Holy Scripture, is it a false god? What is God's attitude toward those who worship false gods?

If God is not in control of every action of every creature, including man, then He cannot make His promises come to pass, and He is not God.

What does Scripture say about the Arminian claim that God does not choose to save or damn individuals based solely upon His sovereign choice?

"And coming near, the disciples said to Him, Why do You speak to them in parables? And answering, He said to them, Because it has been given to you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of Heaven, but it has not been given to those. For whoever has, to him will be given, and he will have overabundance. But whoever does not have, even what he has will be taken from him. Because of this, I speak to them in parables, because seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand. And the prophecy of Isaiah is fulfilled on them, which says, In hearing you will hear and in no way understand, and seeing you will see yet in no way perceive. For the heart of this people has grown fat, and they heard heavily with the ears, and they have closed their eyes, that they not see with the eyes, or hear with the ears, and understand with the heart, and be converted, and I heal them" (Matthew 13:10-15). "For even as the Father raises the dead, and gives life, so also the Son gives life to whomever He wills" (John 5:21). "All that the Father gives to Me shall come to Me, and the [one] coming to Me I will in no way cast out" (John 6:37). "And He said, Because of this, I have told you that no one is able to come to Me except it is given to him from My Father" (John 6:65). "And hearing, the nations rejoiced and glorified the Word of the Lord. And as many as were appointed to eternal life believed" (Acts 13:48). "But we know that [to] the [ones] loving God all things work together for good, [to] those being called according to purpose; because whom He foreknew, He also predestinated [to be] conformed to the image of His Son, for Him to be [the] First-born among many brothers. But whom He predestinated, these He also called; and whom He called, these He also justified; and whom He justified, these He also glorified" (Romans 8:28-30). "for [the children] not yet being born, nor having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of the [One] calling, it was said to her, The greater shall serve the lesser; even as it has been written, I loved Jacob, and I hated Esau. What then shall we say? Is there not unrighteousness with God? Let it not be! For He said to Moses, I will have mercy on whomever I will have mercy, and I will pity whomever I will pity. So, then, [it is] not of the [one] willing, nor of the [one] running, but of the [One] showing mercy, of God. For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, For this very thing I raised you up, so that I might display My power in you, and so that My name might be publicized in all the earth. So, then, to whom He desires, He shows mercy. And to whom He desires, He hardens. You will then say to me, Why does He yet find fault? For who has resisted His will? Yes, rather, O man, who are you answering against God? Shall the thing formed say to the [One] forming [it], Why did You make me like this? Or does not the potter have authority over the clay, out of the one lump to make one vessel to honor, and one to dishonor? But if God, desiring to demonstrate His wrath, and to make His power known, endured in much long-suffering vessels of wrath having been fitted out for destruction, and that He make known the riches of His glory on vessels of mercy which He before prepared for glory, whom He also called, not only us, of Jews, but also out of nations" (Romans 9:11-24). "Blessed [is] the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenlies with Christ, even as He elected us in Him before [the] foundation of [the] world, for us to be holy and without blemish before Him in love, predestinating us to adoption through Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will, to [the] praise of [the] glory of His grace in which He favored us in the [One] having been loved" (Ephesians 1:3-6). "in whom we also have been chosen to an inheritance, being predestinated according to [the] purpose of the [One] working all things according to the counsel of His [own] will" (Ephesians 1:11). "But we ought to thank God always concerning you, brothers, beloved by the Lord, because God chose you from the beginning to salvation in sanctification of [the] Spirit and belief of [the] truth, to which He called you through our gospel, to obtain the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ" (2 Thessalonians 2:13-14). "the [One] having saved us and having called [us] with a holy calling, not according to our works, but according to [His] own purpose and grace given to us in Christ Jesus before eternal times" (2 Timothy 1:9). "Then to you who believe [belongs] the preciousness. But to disobeying ones, [He is the] Stone which those building rejected; this One became [the] Head of the Corner, and a Stone-of-stumbling, and a Rock-of-offense to the [ones] stumbling, being disobedient to the Word, to which they were also appointed" (1 Peter 2:7-8).

A God who makes decisions based on what man does is not God. Do Arminians believe in God? 

(2) Arminians believe that the fall of Adam did not make man totally unable to come to God. They believe that man was affected by the fall, but only to the extent that it is now difficult for men to come to God but not impossible. What does Scripture say? 

"But we are all as the unclean [thing], and all our righteousnesses are as a menstruation cloth. And we all fade as a leaf, and like the wind our iniquities take us away. And [there is] not one who calls on Your name, who stirs himself up to take hold of You. For You have hidden Your face from us, and have melted us away into the hand of our iniquities" (Isaiah 64:6-7). "No one is able to come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him, and I will raise him up in the last day" (John 6:44). "What then? Do we excel? Not at all! For we have charged both Jews and Greeks before, all [with] being under sin; according as it has been written, [There is] not a righteous one, not even one! [There is] not [one] understanding; [there is] not [one] seeking God. All turned away, [they] became worthless together, not [one is] doing goodness, not so much as one!" (Romans 3:9-12). "For the ones that are according to flesh mind the things of the flesh. And the ones according to Spirit [mind] the things of the Spirit. For the mind of the flesh [is] death, but the mind of the Spirit [is] life and peace; because the mind of the flesh [is] enmity towards God; for it is not being subjected to the Law of God, for neither can it [be]. And those being in the flesh are not able to please God" (Romans 8:5-8). "But a natural man does not receive the things of [the] Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he is not able to know [them], because they are spiritually discerned" (1 Corinthians 2:14).

From these Scriptures, would you conclude that men have the free will to either choose good or evil? Is the Arminian view a Christian view of unregenerate man? If it is not Christian, then what is it?

(3) Arminians believe that when the Holy Spirit intends to regenerate a man's heart, the man has the ability to resist the Holy Spirit. Not only do they believe this, but some also believe that once a man is regenerated, even though God wants him to go to heaven, he can lose his salvation and end up in hell. These beliefs show one thing: The view that man is more powerful than God. Man can thwart God's plan. Man is on the throne, and God is subservient to the choices of man. This is incredible blasphemy. Reader, are you getting the full impact of this? Think about it for a moment: A god that is dependent upon man -- a god that is frustrated by the actions of man. Who in the world would call these people Christians? The following are some Scriptures to expose these notions as blasphemous lies: 

"All that the Father gives to Me shall come to Me, and the [one] coming to Me I will in no way cast out" (John 6:37). "My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me. And I give eternal life to them, and they shall not perish to the age, never! And not anyone shall pluck them out of My hand. My Father who has given [them] to Me is greater than all, and no one is able to pluck out of My Father's hand" (John 10:27-29). "But we know that [to] the [ones] loving God all things work together for good, [to] those being called according to purpose; because whom He foreknew, He also predestinated [to be] conformed to the image of His Son, for Him to be [the] First-born among many brothers. But whom He predestinated, these He also called; and whom He called, these He also justified; and whom He justified, these He also glorified" (Romans 8:28-30). "But He confirming us and anointing us with you in Christ is God, even He having sealed us, and having given the earnest of the Spirit in our hearts" (2 Corinthians 1:21-22). "in whom also you, hearing the Word of Truth, the gospel of your salvation, in whom also believing you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, who is an earnest of our inheritance, to [the] redemption of the purchased possession, to [the] praise of His glory" (Ephesians 1:13-14). "being persuaded of this very thing, that the [One] having begun a good work in you will finish [it] until [the] day of Jesus Christ" (Philippians 1:6).

(4) Arminians believe that Jesus Christ died for every single human being without exception, including those who are and who will end up burning in hell. These blasphemers believe that the precious blood of Jesus, shed for the remission of sins, has no power to save in and of itself. This should anger us Christians with a holy anger. This should stir our souls to cry out against this lie from the pit of hell.

The atoning work of Christ is at the very heart of the gospel. If one gets the atonement wrong, one gets the gospel wrong. We who are Christians believe in salvation conditioned on the work of Christ alone. That means that we believe that it is the work of Christ that makes the only difference between salvation and damnation. That also means that we believe that the work of Christ ensures the salvation of all whom Christ represented. Do Arminians believe this, or do they believe in salvation conditioned on the sinner?

Let us briefly go over some terms with which all of us should be familiar, and how they relate to the topic at hand. 

First, atonement. Atonement means reconciliation. Christ's blood atoned -- it achieved reconciliation between God and the people for whom Christ died. If Christ died for everyone, which is what the Arminians say, then every single person has been reconciled to God. And if every single person has been reconciled to God, then when God sends people to hell, He is a liar.

Second, propitiation. To propitiate means to appease or to pacify. Christ was a propitiatory sacrifice; He appeased God's wrath when He became sin for His people and incurred the judgment for that sin. If Christ died for everyone without exception, then God's wrath against every single person's sin has been appeased. However, if God sends even one person to hell whose sins have been punished, then God is punishing twice for the same sins -- once when Jesus died, and now a second time when people are being punished in hell. So has God's wrath really been appeased? If God judges anyone to hell for whom Christ died, then this nullifies Christ as propitiation.

Third, redemption. To redeem means to pay the price for a possession so as to rescue or deliver that possession. Ransom is another word that is used. Christ's blood paid the price for His people's sins and bought His people as His very own. If Christ died for everyone without exception, every single person has been bought with Christ's blood and has been claimed as His own. What, then, are blood-bought sinners doing in hell? To think that some people believe that some human beings who were bought by the blood of Christ, whose sins have been paid for, are being tormented in hell is utterly repugnant. It is spitting in Christ's face. Of what account is Christ's blood? The precious blood of Christ is trampled underfoot by these God-haters.

For whom did Christ die? The Scriptures cannot be more clear:

"And she will bear a son, and you shall call His name Jesus, for He shall save His people from their sins" (Matthew 1:21). "Even as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many" (Matthew 20:28). "I am the Good Shepherd! The Good Shepherd lays down His life on behalf of the sheep" (John 10:11). "Even as the Father knows Me, I also know the Father; and I lay down My life for the sheep" (John 10:15). "But you do not believe for you are not of My sheep, as I said to you. My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me. And I give eternal life to them, and they shall not perish to the age, never! And not anyone shall pluck them out of My hand" (John 10:26-28). "Then take heed to yourselves and to all the flock, in which the Holy Spirit placed you [as] overseers, to shepherd the assembly of God which He purchased through [His] own blood" (Acts 20:28). "For I delivered to you in the first place what I also received, that Christ died for our sins, according to the Scriptures" (1 Corinthians 15:3). "Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the assembly and gave Himself up on its behalf" (Ephesians 5:25). "For this reason He ought by all means to become like [His] brothers, that He might become a merciful and faithful high priest in the things respecting God, in order to make propitiation for the sins of [His] people" (Hebrews 2:17).

What conclusions can we come to from this study?

Romans 1:16-17 says that the gospel, which is the power of God unto salvation, reveals the righteousness of God. Romans 10:3 says that those who are ignorant of this righteousness of God revealed in the gospel are unregenerate. Mark 16:16 says that those who do not believe the gospel are unregenerate. 2 John 9 says that those who do not abide in the doctrine of Christ are unregenerate. Galatians 1:6-9 says that anyone who preaches a different gospel than the gospel of the Apostles is unregenerate. Do Arminians believe the gospel? Are Arminians ignorant of the righteousness of God revealed in the gospel? Do Arminians abide in the doctrine of Christ? Do Arminians believe and preach a different gospel? Is a gospel that tells people that they have the ability to make a decision for Christ, that tells people that God needs us to cooperate with Him in order for us to be saved, that tells people that Christ's blood paid the price for the sins of everyone in the whole world -- is that the true gospel or a different gospel?

Arminians have created a god of themselves. The god of self is on the throne. Glory is given to man and not to God. In order to put self on the throne, you must relegate God to an impotent, helpless, weak, changeable being, and that is exactly what Arminians do. 

Arminians have an impotent god whose will is not accomplished without human cooperation. When humans refuse to cooperate with His "plan," God has to either go to "Plan B" or give up the plan altogether.

Arminians have an impotent atonement in which Christ's blood does not ensure the salvation of all for whom He died. The work of Christ does not make the only difference between salvation and damnation; instead, Jesus died to save no one in particular. Thus, it is up to the sinner to make the difference. Redemption, then, is not people being "bought by the blood of Christ" unto salvation, but it is a "take it or leave it" redemption. They believe that some blood-bought sinners will go to hell.

Arminians believe that, since God foresaw which people would believe, He chose them to be saved. This makes salvation dependent upon the merit of man and not upon God's grace. It also makes room for the gospel of self-esteem, which says that there was something of worth in me that God saw, and thus He chose me.

Arminians believe that an unregenerate sinner is not totally dead in sins. They believe that an unregenerate sinner can reach out to God. The truth is that a dead man cannot reach out unless a miracle of regeneration takes place.

Arminians believe in decisional regeneration; the Holy Spirit waits and pleads impotently for the sinner to make a decision and only when the sinner decides to follow Jesus does the work of regeneration happen in the sinner's heart. This gives rise to "evangelism" based on getting as many people as possible to "make a decision for Christ." It looks at the number of people who came forward as a measure of success.

Arminians believe that, since everyone has the potential to come to Christ, we must do everything within our power to get them to make a decision. This gives rise to unbeliever-centered evangelism rather than God-centered evangelism. In order to attract the unbeliever, gimmicks are used to appeal to the unbeliever, or the service is "user-friendly" and makes the unbeliever feel as comfortable as possible. God is not preached as a Holy, Almighty Lord to Whom the sinner is commanded to bow, but He is preached as someone who needs the sinner to come to Him. 

Arminians believe that we need to be doing good works because it keeps us from falling away, as opposed to doing good works out of obedience and love and gratitude for the God who chose us not based on anything that we have done.

Arminians believe that the only difference between someone who goes to heaven and someone who goes to hell is not what Christ has done, but is what the heaven-bound person has done for himself.

Read the words of the world-famous heretic, Billy Graham: "The prayer needed is not that Christ may accept you, but rather that you will accept Christ. You do not have to wait for Christ to accept you. He is waiting to see the evidence of your faith in accepting him. The decision is yours, not Christ's. He decided in favor of you when he died for you on the cross. Now you must decide for him. ... Christ will not enter your life in opposition to your beliefs. As soon as he sees that you believe in him and trust in his promise, he will enter. ... [T]he initial step is one of absolute faith on your part" (from the March 1979 My Answer, as quoted in the Jan/Feb 1982 issue of The Trinity Review). This is blasphemy that comes from the father of lies, and unless God sees fit to save him, Billy Graham will go to hell.

What then should our response be as believers?

First, we must judge righteous judgment. We must call a liar a liar and an idolater an idolater. This will not win any popularity contests, but it is totally biblical. Arminianism is a lie. Arminianism is wickedness. Arminians are liars. Arminians are wicked sinners. They are not my brothers, and they are not my sisters. Second, if we truly believe that the christ of Arminianism is not the Christ of Holy Scripture and that Arminians are not Christians, then we must be separate from them.

"Do not be unequally yoked [with] unbelievers. For what partnership does righteousness [have] with lawlessness? And what fellowship does light [have] with darkness? And what agreement does Christ [have] with Belial? Or what part does a believer [have] with an unbeliever? And what agreement does a temple of God [have] with idols? For you are a temple of [the] living God, even as God said, I will dwell in them and walk among [them], and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. Because of this, come out from among them and be separated, says [the] Lord, and do not touch [the] unclean thing, and I will receive you. And I will be a Father to you, and you will be sons and daughters to Me, says [the] Lord Almighty" (2 Corinthians 6:14-18). "And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather even reprove [them]" (Ephesians 5:11).

2 Timothy 3:1-7 gives us a description of wickedness in the last days: "But know this, that in [the] last days grievous times will be [upon us]. For men will be lovers of themselves, money-lovers, braggarts, arrogant, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural feeling, unyielding, slanderers, without self-control, savage, haters of good, betrayers, reckless, puffed up, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness, but denying the power of it; even turn away from these. For of these are those creeping into houses and leading silly women captive, [the ones] having been heaped with sins, being led away by various lusts, always learning, but never being able to come to a full knowledge of [the] truth" (2 Timothy 3:1-7).

Are Arminians lovers of themselves? Do they hold to a form of godliness but deny its power, always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth? 

Psalm 1 gives the description of those who do not walk in the counsel of Arminians or stand in the path of Arminians or sit in the seat of Arminians and says that Arminians will not stand in the assembly of the righteous. 2 John 1:11 says that those who consider Arminians to be their brothers in Christ are participants in the evil deeds of the Arminians and are thus just as unregenerate as the Arminians. 

Third, we must present a bold witness to the world and to professing Christianity. We are different than the church down the road. It does make a difference. And the world and other professing Christians should be able to see that difference. We believe in a sovereign God who has decreed every single thing that has ever come to pass and will ever come to pass. We believe that the work of Christ alone ensures the salvation of all whom He represented and is what makes the difference between salvation and damnation. 

Fourth, we must confront others who profess to be Christians about these basics of the faith. We must not let a relationship with a professing Christian even start without a confrontation of this type. If they are not saved, God may use this confrontation to change their hearts and grant them repentance. If they are saved, there is fellowship with them in the truth.

Fifth, we must recognize Arminianism that comes in the guise of sovereign grace. There are very well-known people out there who claim to believe the doctrines of grace who are totally Arminian in their evangelism. They are putting forth the lie that, although redemption is particular to the elect, true gospel preaching tells people that God loves everyone, truly desires that everyone be saved, and shows grace to everyone in the "offering" of the gospel, whereas 2 Corinthians 2:15-16 makes it clear that preaching is for the purpose of saving some and hardening others. The gospel is not an offer -- it is God's promise to save His people conditioned on the atoning blood and imputed righteousness of Jesus Christ alone. Some will say that Christ's atonement is "sufficient for all but efficient for the elect." This is nothing more than universal atonement in disguise. Some will say that salvation is conditioned on faith and that the Holy Spirit enables the person to meet that condition. This is nothing more than a version of salvation conditioned on the sinner. If salvation is conditioned in any way to any degree on the sinner, even if God enables the person to meet the condition, then it is not salvation conditioned on the work of Christ alone, and it is a false gospel.

Sixth, we must not be proud that we are believers. In a study such as this in which a certain segment of professing Christianity is exposed as wicked, it is inevitable that some will see this as pride. But exposing wickedness should not come from pride. It should come from obedience to God's Word. And we must always remember that if it were not for the grace of God, we, too, would be God-hating Arminians. The grace that God has bestowed upon us should make us fall on our faces in the dirt in humility, knowing that we have done nothing to deserve this salvation. We should also be in constant praise and wonder at the grace of Almighty God toward us. It should make us live a life of gratitude and love for God, and this gratitude and love must translate into obedience of God's commands. We do not obey for the same reason the Arminian obeys. The Arminian is obeying because he believes his final glory is conditioned on his obedience. We obey out of love for a God who chose us before the foundation of the world and who saved us and will keep us saved for His own glory.

After hearing all this, someone may ask, "But don't Arminians believe that Jesus Christ is God?" Our response should be, "What kind of god do Arminians say that Jesus is?" Someone else may ask, "But don't Arminians believe that Christ died on the cross for our sins?" Our response should be, "Do Arminians believe that Christ's blood atoned, redeemed, and propitiated? If not, what in the world does an Arminian mean by 'Christ died on the cross for our sins?'" Arminians say biblical phrases. They talk of Christ's death for sinners. They talk of grace. They even talk of the sovereignty of God. But when you confront them on what they really mean, you find that their house is built on sand.

Christians are to contend earnestly for the faith which was once delivered to all the saints, as God says in Jude 3. The latter part of Isaiah 48:11 says,"I will not give My glory to another." The first part of Isaiah 42:8 says the same thing: "I [am] Jehovah; that is My name; and I will not give My glory to another." May we live with a holy zeal to give God all the glory, and, as God says in 2 Corinthians 10:5, let us demolish arguments and every high thing lifting up itself against the knowledge of God, and let us bring into captivity every thought into the obedience of Christ.

by Marc D. Carpenter
www.outsidethecamp.org



 The Damnable Heresy of Arminianism

Monday, May 28, 2012

Calvin: The Efficacy of the Blood of Christ

Book IV, Chapter 1, Section 2

We declare that we believe in God, both because our mind reclines upon him as true, and our confidence is fully satisfied in him. This cannot be said of the Church, just as it cannot be said of the forgiveness of sins, or the resurrection of the body. Wherefore, although I am unwilling to dispute about words, yet I would rather keep to the proper form, as better fitted to express the thing that is meant, than affect terms by which the meaning is causelessly obscured. The object of the expression is to teach us, that though the devil leaves no stone unturned in order to destroy the grace of Christ, and the enemies of God rush with insane violence in the same direction, it cannot be extinguished,—the blood of Christ cannot be rendered barren, and prevented from producing fruit. Hence, regard must be had both to the secret election and to the internal calling of God, because he alone “knoweth them that are his” (2 Tim. 2:19); and as Paul expresses it, holds them as it were enclosed under his seal, although, at the same time, they wear his insignia, and are thus distinguished from the reprobate. But as they are a small and despised number, concealed in an immense crowd, like a few grains of wheat buried among a heap of chaff, to God alone must be left the knowledge of his Church, of which his secret election forms the foundation.D103 Nor is it enough to embrace the number of the elect in thought and intention merely. By the unity of the Church we must understand a unity into which we feel persuaded that we are truly ingrafted. For unless we are united with all the other members under Christ our head, no hope of the future inheritance awaits us. Hence the Church is called Catholic or Universal (August. Ep. 48), for two or three cannot be invented without dividing Christ; and this is impossible. All the elect of God are so joined together in Christ, that as they depend on one head, so they are as it were compacted into one body, being knit together like its different members; made truly one by living together under the same Spirit of God in one faith, hope, and charity, called not only to the same inheritance of eternal life, but to participation in one God and Christ. For although the sad devastation which everywhere meets our view may proclaim that no Church remains, let us know that the death of Christ produces fruit, and that God wondrously preserves his Church, while placing it as it were in concealment. Thus it was said to Elijah, “Yet I have left me seven thousand in Israel” (1 Kings 19:18).



D103:  Here Calvin provides a basis for the concept, “the invisible Church.” The term “invisible” refers to the fact that a knowledge of those who are truly members of Christ’s body is known to God alone and cannot with certainty be ascertained by men (except for themselves, through their effectual calling). (see also section 7)

Calvin, J. (1997). Institutes of the Christian religion. Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.

Saturday, March 10, 2012

The Church Fathers Teach Particular Atonement

Anselm: "If you die in unbelief, Christ did not die for you."


Justin Martyr (A.D. 150): "He endured the sufferings for those men whose souls are [actually] purified from all iniquity...As Jacob served Laban for the cattle that were spotted, and of various forms, so Christ served even to the cross for men of every kind, of many and various shapes, procuring them by His blood and the mystery of the cross."

Irenaeus (A.D. 180): "He came to save all, all, I say, who through Him are born again unto God, infants, and little ones, and children, and young men, and old men...Jesus is the Savior of them that believe; but the Lord of them that believe not. Wherefore, Christ is introduced in the gospel weary...promising to give His life a ransom, in the room of, many."

Tertullian (A.D. 200): "Christ died for the salvation of His people...for the church."

Cyprian (A.D. 250): "All the sheep which Christ hath sought up by His blood and sufferings are saved...Whosoever shall be found in the blood, and with the mark of Christ shall only escape...He redeemed the believers with the price of His own blood...Let him be afraid to die who is not reckoned to have any part in the cross and sufferings of Christ."

Lactantius (A.D. 320): "He was to suffer and be slain for the salvation of many people...who having suffered death for us, hath made us heirs of the everlasting kingdom, having abdicated and disinherited the people of the Jews...He stretched out His hands in the passion and measured the world, that He might at the very time show that a large people, gathered out of all languages and tribes, should come under His wings, and receive the most great and sublime sign."

Eusebius (A.D. 330): "To what 'us' does he refer, unless to them that believe in Him? For to them that do not believe in Him, He is the author of their fire and burning. The cause of Christ's coming is the redemption of those that were to be saved by Him."

Julius (A.D. 350): "The Son of God, by the pouring out of His precious blood, redeemed His set apart ones; they are delivered by the blood of Christ."

Hilarion (A.D. 363): "He shall remain in the sight of God forever, having already taken all whom He hath redeemed to be kings of heaven, and co-heirs of eternity, delivering them as the kingdom of God to the Father."

Ambrose (A.D. 380): "Before the foundation of the world, it was God's will that Christ should suffer for our salvation...Can He damn thee, whom He hath redeemed from death, for whom He offered Himself, whose life He knows is the reward of His own death?"

Pacian (A.D. 380): "Much more, He will not allow him that is redeemed to be destroyed, nor will He cast away those whom He has redeemed with a great price."

Epiphanius (A.D. 390): "If you are redeemed...If therefore ye are bought with blood, thou are not the number of them who were bought with blood, O Manes, because thou deniest the blood...He gave His life for His own sheep."

Jerome (A.D. 390): "Christ is sacrificed for the salvation of believers...Not all are redeemed, for not all shall be saved, but the remnant...All those who are redeemed and delivered by Thy blood return to Zion, which Thou hast prepared for Thyself by Thine own blood...Christ came to redeem Zion [a metaphor for the church] with His blood. But lest we should think that all are Zion or every one in Zion is truly redeemed of the Lord, who are redeemed by the blood of Christ form the Church...He did not give His life for every man, but for many, that is, for those who would believe."

Anselm: "If you die in unbelief, Christ did not die for you."

Remigius (A.D. 850): "Since only the elect are saved, it may be accepted that Christ did not come to save all and did not die on the cross for all."

[Note:  This is a repost so the quotes have no citations and have not been verified as verbatim.  That being said, these are most likely accurate quotes.]

Addendum:  This apparently came from the Underdog Theology blog:  T.U.L.I.P. in the Church Fathers


Tuesday, August 23, 2011

For Whom Did Christ Die? by Angus Stewart


For Whom Did Christ Die?

Rev. Angus Stewart


For whom did Jesus Christ, the incarnate Son of God, die on the cross? This foundational question must especially be asked and answered in our day because many believe that the Lord shed His blood for everyone head for head, excluding no one. This view, universal atonement, is preached in many pulpits and widely promoted as if it were gospel truth. But this position must be analysed very carefully. Is it really true that Christ gave His life to save everybody without exception?

This short pamphlet presents 19 simple arguments against this popular error. First, it shows that the view that the Son of God died for all men absolutely is foolish and contradictory. Arguments 1-8 are stated in the form "Did Christ Really Die for ...?" Argument 9 lists antithetically biblical names given to those for whom the Saviour shed His blood. Second, universal atonement is ruled out by considerations from the Holy Trinity, the Old Testament sacrifices and the truth that Christ’s death actually atones and saves (arguments 10-13). Third, five well-known and pertinent biblical chapters are expounded proving particular redemption, that Jesus laid down His life for the elect alone (arguments 14-18), which is the teaching of the Reformed creeds on the basis of the Word of God (argument 19). Readers are urged to look up and study the Scripture texts cited throughout this pamphlet; this is especially important for arguments 14-18.


1. Did Christ Really Die for Those Who Were Already in Hell?

How could the Triune God, who is possessed of infinite wisdom and understanding, send His dearly beloved Son to ransom from sin and hell those who were already in hell, a place of torment from which the damned have no way out (Luke 16:26; Mark 9:43-48; Rev. 14:10-11)?

2. Did Christ Really Die for Those Who Had Already Committed the Unpardonable Sin?

In His public ministry, Jesus spoke of the unpardonable sin: "Whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come" (Matt. 12:32). Nor was Christ speaking here merely in the abstract; some of His hearers that day had committed that sin (22-37). The Lord knew, therefore, that some people, including the Pharisees before Him (24), could not be forgiven. What sense then is there in the Saviour dying for the redemption and forgiveness (Eph. 1:7) of those whom He already knew could not be forgiven?

3. Did Christ Really Die for Those Who Never Hear the Gospel?

God sent His Word to only one people, the Israelites, during the Old Testament age, and "He hath not dealt so with any [other] nation" (Ps. 147:19-20; Acts 14:16). Moreover, Jehovah does not send the gospel in the New Testament age to everybody either (Matt. 24:14; Acts 16:6-8). Why then would God send His Son to die for those who never hear the gospel and hence could never be saved (Rom. 10:14, 17)?

4. Did Christ Really Die for Judas, the Son of Perdition?

The Bible teaches that Judas was "the son of perdition" (John 17:12), that is, a man wholly characterized by perishing, ruin and eternal destruction. Did the Lord really die for Judas when He knew that the Old Testament had already prophesied that Judas would betray Him (Ps. 41:9; 109:6-19) and "go to his own place," namely hell (Acts 1:25; John 17:12)?

5. Did Christ Really Die for Esau Whom God Hated?

Scripture states that God hated Esau (Rom. 9:13) but repeatedly the Saviour’s atonement is spoken of as the fruit of God’s love (John 3:16; Rom. 5:8; I John 4:10). How then could God send His Son in His infinite, eternal and boundless love (Eph. 3:18-19) to die for Esau whom He hated?

6. Did Christ Really Die for the False, Harlot Church?

Since the Lord’s sacrifice is motivated by His love for those for whom He died (John 15:13; Gal. 2:20; Eph. 5:25), if He laid down His life for absolutely everybody, then he also loved and died for the false church, the whore, and the multitudes who fornicate with her in her corrupt worship (Rev. 17:1-2, 15)! But Ephesians 5:25 teaches that the Son of God "loved the church, and gave himself for it." No mention is made here of a love of Christ or a death of Christ for that which is not the true, elect church which is sanctified by God’s cleansing Word (26) and presented spotless at the last day (27).

If the Lord Jesus loved and died for everyone head for head (which necessarily includes the false church), then He must have "loved the church [and the false church], and gave himself for [both of them]." Then husbands would be commanded, "love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church [and the false church]" (25). Thus husbands would have to love their wives even as Christ loves His bride and a harlot, the false church.

But Scripture teaches that our Saviour has one bride, the church of all ages (Rev. 21:2). He loved her and gave Himself for her alone. This—and not the theory that the Redeemer loved and died for everybody—is the truth of the cross and the biblical model for Christian husbands who are not to love and give themselves for harlots.

7. Did Christ Really Die for Antichrist and His Followers?

If the Lord Jesus died for all men, then it follows that he was crucified to save Antichrist, the "man of sin" (II Thess. 2:3), who "opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is God, or that is worshipped" (4). This man is the culmination of the working of the "mystery of iniquity" (7), the one who works with "all deceivableness of unrighteousness" (10), whose "coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders" (9). Is it possible that the Father gave Christ to die for Antichrist? Did the One who is God and man really go to the cross for Satan’s man, the "man of sin" and "son of perdition" (3), the one wholly characterized by iniquity and eternal destruction? Did the eternal, omniscient God really send His Son to reconcile the lawless one whom He has ordained to be destroyed by the "spirit of [Christ’s] mouth" and "the brightness of his coming" (8)?

II Thessalonians 2 also speaks of Antichrist’s followers. They reject the truth and the son of perdition deceives them; therefore, both parties are guilty (10). But we also read that "God shall send them strong delusion that they should believe a lie: that they all might be damned" (11-12). If God loved them and gave His Son to die for them and wants to reconcile them to Himself, then why does He send them strong delusion in order that they should believe the lie in order that they all might be damned (11-12)?

Similarly, a death of Christ for absolutely everybody presents the Lamb of God as offering Himself as a sacrifice for the beast and the false prophet whom we are told shall be "cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone" (Rev. 19:20). Moreover, "whosoever was not found written in the book of life [will be] cast into the lake of fire" (Rev. 20:15). If the Son of God died for them, His ransom did nothing to free them from eternal punishment.

8. Did Christ Really Die for Other Reprobate Individuals and Groups?

If the Lord died for all absolutely, He must have died for Cain as well as Abel, Nimrod as well as Noah, Jezebel as well as Elijah. This holds for nations too. Christ must have redeemed not only Israel but also the Amalekites, against whom God swore to fight for generations (Ex. 17:14-16); the Amorites, including Sihon whose heart Jehovah made obdurate that He might destroy him (Deut. 2:30); the Canaanites, whom God hardened that they might go to battle with Israel and be slaughtered (Josh. 11:20); and the Philistines, including Goliath; as well as the homosexual Sodomites, upon whom the Most High rained down fire and brimstone (Gen. 19:24); and the Edomites, whom He hated and devastated (Mal. 1:2-5).

The incarnate Son must even have offered Himself a sacrifice for Pharaoh, whom God raised up in order to show His power in drowning him (Ex. 9:16; Rom. 9:17), and the Egyptians whom He crushed at the Red Sea (Ex. 14:26-28), even though no provision was made for the application of lambs’ blood upon their lintels (Ex. 12).

9. Christ Died for His People, Friends, Etc.

The truth is that Jesus Christ died for His "people" (Matt. 1:21; Heb. 2:17) and His "friends" (John 15:13-14). The "people" whom He redeemed are further described as "his seed" (Isa. 53:10) and not the seed of the serpent (Gen. 3:15); His "sons," "children" and "brethren" (Heb. 2:10-14) and not "bastards," i.e., the illegitimate (Heb. 12:8); His "sheep" (John 10:11, 15) and not "the goats" (Matt. 25:33); His "church" (Acts 20:28; Eph. 5:25) and not the "synagogue of Satan" (Rev. 2:9; 3:9); and the "many" (Isa. 53:11-12; Matt. 20:28; 26:28; Mark 14:24; Heb. 9:28) and not everybody head for head.

10. The Truth of the Trinity Rules Out Universal Atonement

The orthodox teaching of the Holy Trinity militates against the notion that Christ died for everyone head for head. The Father chose to save the elect alone and not the reprobate (Rom. 9:6-24; Eph. 1:3-6), the Spirit applies redemption to the elect alone and not the reprobate (Rom. 8:1-27; Eph. 1:13-14), but the Son (allegedly) died for the elect and the reprobate. Thus there is a radical disjuncture between the extent of the saving work of the Father and the Spirit (elect but not reprobate) and the extent of the saving work of the Son (elect and reprobate). Where then is the unity between the three Persons of the Godhead? They are not all of one mind and they do not all have one purpose. In fact, one Person of the Trinity (the Son) is working for a goal (the salvation of the reprobate) not shared by the other two Persons (the Father and the Spirit). The Father elects His people to be redeemed, the Spirit applies this redemption to the same elect people, but the Son (allegedly) dies to redeem some whom the Father chose not to redeem and some to whom the Spirit wills not to apply redemption.

Thus the teaching of universal atonement is forbidden by the orthodox doctrine of the Holy Trinity and runs counter to scriptural statements regarding the unity of the extent of the saving work of the Father and the Son (John 10:15-17; Rom. 3:25-26; II Cor. 5:18-19; Eph. 1:4-7); the Son and the Spirit (Gal. 4:4-6; Heb. 9:14); and the Father, the Son and the Spirit (Isa. 59:20-21; Eph. 1:3-14; II Thess. 2:13-14; Titus 3:4-6; I Peter 1:2; Rev. 1:4-6).

11. The Old Testament Sacrifices Were Not Universal

Scripture, especially the book of Hebrews, makes it very clear that the Old Testament sacrifices were types and shadows of our great high priest’s death on the cross. If the Lamb of God offered Himself for the sins of everybody, then one would expect this to be reflected in the sacrificial system. Leviticus 1-7, the central passage on the Mosaic sacrifices, speaks of the burnt offering, the meal offering, the peace offering, the sin offering and the trespass offering. Always these sacrifices are particular, for Israel, the church (Lev. 1:2; 4:13; 7:36, 38), and nowhere do we read of universal atonement, an offering for every individual Jew and Gentile.

Similarly, on the Day of Atonement, the high priest made atonement for the Israelites, not the Moabites nor the Jebusites (Lev. 16:16, 17, 19, 21, 34). Moreover, the high priest bore "the names of [the twelve tribes of] the children of Israel"—not the names of the children of Esau—on the breastplate "upon his heart, when he [went] in unto the holy place," speaking of his representative and intercessory work for them (Ex. 28:29).

Lest it be said that the Old Testament sacrifices speak of an atonement for every member of the nation of Israel, we recall that fact that "they are not all Israel, which are of Israel" (Rom. 9:6) and that the true Jew is not one circumcised in the flesh but one circumcised in the spirit (Rom. 2:28-29). Our Lord shed His blood for the true Israel and the Old Testament types point to His redemption of the spiritual "Israel of God," consisting of elect Jews and Gentiles (Gal. 6:16).

12. Christ’s Death Actually Atones

Universal atonement is contradicted by the biblical presentation of Christ’s sacrifice as a work which actually atones and blots out sin. The Son of God delivered us from the kingdom of the devil (Heb. 2:14-15). He propitiated God’s wrath against us by bearing God’s righteous indignation against our sins (I John 4:10). He reconciled us (Rom. 5:10), redeemed us (Gal. 3:13) and ransomed us (Matt. 20:28).

Scripture does not teach that Christ merely made atonement possible by His death. Nowhere does it say that. The Bible teaches that Jesus actually delivered, reconciled, redeemed and ransomed us by His cross. He did not merely make it possible for all men to be delivered, reconciled, redeemed and ransomed. On the cross, the Messiah turned away God’s punitive wrath against us for ever. It is not true that Jehovah’s wrath is only potentially turned away from all men so that all can be saved if they, by an act of their "free will," choose Jesus. This view would make entrance into God’s kingdom depend on man’s decision and not on God’s election!

If the Son of God paid the price for all men yet some men perish in hell, then His cross does not save all for whom it was made. Then too it is not substitutionary, for if He bore the punishment of the reprobate—in their stead!—why do they perish? If some end up in hell for whom Christ died, then God punished their sins twice, once on the Lord Jesus and once on them. How can the infinitely just God require payment for sins twice? How can He demand punishment of the sinner in hell when satisfaction has already been made for his sins by Jesus? And how can some whom the Saviour delivered, reconciled, redeemed and ransomed dwell forever as God’s enemies in everlasting darkness in the bottomless pit of hell? Remember, there is no condemnation for those for whom Christ died (Rom. 8:34)!

So far is the Son of God from shedding His blood for everybody that His death is actually "the judgment of this world," for it is the casting out of Satan, "the prince of this world" (John 12:31), bringing destruction upon the devil and his "seed" (Gen. 3:15).

13. Christ’s Death Actually Saves

If the Lord Jesus died for absolutely everybody, then why are not all actually saved? Romans 6 makes it clear that those who are united to Christ in His death are dead to sin (6-7) and "alive unto God" (11), and will be raised bodily to glory (5). But many spend all their days "dead in trespasses and sins" (Eph. 2:1) and will rise in the "resurrection of damnation" (John 5:29). We can only conclude that they were not united to Christ in His death (i.e., He did not die for them), for if the reprobate were united to the Son of God in His death (i.e., if He died for them), they would die to sin and live unto God (Rom. 14:9; II Cor. 5:14-15).

Scripture teaches that both faith (Eph. 2:8-9; Phil. 1:29) and repentance (Acts 5:31; 11:18; II Tim. 2:25) are gifts of God’s grace. Faith and repentance are instances of "spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ" (Eph. 1:3). God’s blessings in Christ come through the cross (Rom. 8:32; Gal. 3:13-14). But "all men have not faith" (II Thess. 3:2) nor do all repent (Rev. 16:11). Thus faith and repentance were not purchased for everybody head for head on the cross and so the Saviour did not die for all.

Titus 2:14 explains that the Son’s purpose in His redemption on the cross is the sanctification of His own "peculiar people" that we would be purified and be "zealous of good works." But many die impenitently and are "filthy" (Rev. 22:11) because of their "ungodly deeds" (Jude 15). Since the purpose of the omnipotent God always stands (Rom. 9:11) and can never be resisted (II Chron. 20:6), it was not the Lord’s purpose to sanctify and redeem the reprobate by the cross. Thus Christ did not die for them.

14. John 10 Teaches Particular Redemption

In John 10, Jesus teaches that He, the good shepherd, died for His sheep: "I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep" (11); "I lay down my life for the sheep" (15). Just as every earthly shepherd has his "own sheep" (3, 4), Christ refers to His "fold" or flock (16) as "my sheep" (14, 26, 27). Later, the Lord told some people that they were not His sheep and that this was the reason why they did not believe: "But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep" (26).

The argument is simple: Jesus died for His sheep (11, 15), knowing exactly who they are (14, 26, 27); He told certain people that they were not His sheep (26); therefore, He did not die for them. The Lord also said that His sheep were given to Him by His Father (29). The Father gave the sheep to the Son in His eternal purpose of election so that in time He would die for them and gather them out of all nations (16). Since Christ died for His sheep (and some are not His sheep), and His sheep are the elect, Christ died for the elect alone.

15. John 17 Teaches Particular Redemption

In His high priestly prayer in John 17, Jesus states, "I pray for them: I pray not for the world, but for them which thou hast given me; for they are thine" (9). The "world" here is the world of the reprobate or non-elect for whom the incarnate Son of God does not pray, as opposed to the elect ("them which thou hast given me").

If the Lord did not do the lesser thing (pray for the reprobate world), did He really do the greater thing (die for the reprobate world)? Intercession is one of the two main aspects of Christ’s priestly work. If Jesus did not pray for the world (one aspect of His priestly work), is it possible that He died for the world (the other aspect of His priestly work)? This would destroy the unity of Christ’s priestly office, for He would be dying for those for whom He did not (and does not) intercede. Furthermore, the Saviour prays on the basis of His finished work of redemption (Isa. 53:12; Rom. 8:34; Heb. 7:25-27; 9:24-26). Therefore, if He did not pray for the world, it is because He did not die for the world.

In John 17, Jesus is praying just hours before the cross and with a view to His sacrificial death, for He says, "Father, the hour is come" (1). Throughout John 17, Christ’s prayers and, therefore, His redeeming work are particular, only for the elect, those whom the Father gave Him (2, 6, 9, 11, 12, 24). Our Lord’s prayers that the Father keep (11-16), sanctify (17-19), unite (20-23) and glorify (24-26) "as many as thou hast given him" (2) are powerfully answered, for we are granted "eternal life" (2-3).

Jesus says, "And for their sakes I sanctify myself, that they also might be sanctified" (19). Christ’s sanctifying Himself is His consecrating and dedicating Himself to do the will of Him who sent Him. Our Lord especially set Himself apart as our willing sacrifice on the cross. This, He tells us, was "for their sakes," for those whom the Father gave Him, the elect. Thus Christ’s prayers and sacrifice are not only particular—"for them which thou hast given me" (9)—but also exclusive, "not for the world" (9).

16. Isaiah 53 Teaches Particular Redemption

Isaiah 53 is the greatest chapter in the Old Testament, and possibly in the whole Bible, on our Saviour’s substitutionary atonement. The "us" for whose sins Christ was "wounded" (4-6) are given specific names: "my people" (8), "his seed" (10), and the "many"—not all men head for head (11-12). They are the "pleasure of the Lord" who "prosper in his hand" (10). God never made the reprobate "prosper in his hand" and He was never pleased with them (Ps. 2:4-5; Prov. 3:32-34). They are not His "seed," "people" and "pleasure," so Jesus did not die for them.

Those for whom Christ died "are healed" by "his stripes" (Isa. 53:5). It is not merely that they might be healed if they believe, but they really are healed. Those whose sins the Son bore are also justified: "my righteous servant [shall] justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities" (11). God’s elect "people" (8) are declared perfectly righteous for Christ bore our punishment (11). The reprobate are not justified, thus He did not atone for them. It is for the "many" whose sins He bore that the Saviour intercedes (12). Remember, Jesus said, "I pray not for the world, but for them which thou hast given me" (John 17:9). The "many" for whom Christ suffered and for whom He prays are the elect, not the reprobate world.

In this way, Jesus is perfectly "satisfied" (Isa. 53:11). If some for whom He was "stricken" (8) and for whom He intercedes (12) are not healed (5) and justified (11) and do not "prosper in his hand" (10) and do not receive a share in His spoils (12), Christ would not be "satisfied" (11). If even one soul perishes for whom He died, Christ’s purpose is not fully realised, His atonement is not totally successful and He is dissatisfied. The notion that Jesus shed His precious blood for everybody head for head presents the cross as an abject failure with regard to most of those for whom He died and contradicts the Bible’s teaching that Christ is "satisfied" with the fruit of His death (11).

17. Ephesians 1 Teaches Particular Redemption

Ephesians 1:3 declares that we have been blessed "with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ." These blessings come to us "according as he [i.e., God] hath chosen us in him [i.e., Christ] before the foundation of the world" (4), that is, we receive all these blessings according to our eternal election (4) and predestination (5). Ephesians 1 enumerates some of our spiritual blessings: holiness (4), adoption (5), acceptance with God (6), redemption (7), the forgiveness of sins (7), the knowledge of God’s will (9), the sealing of the Holy Spirit (13) and an eternal inheritance (11, 14). Not only are we blessed according to our election (4, 5) but all the elect have "all spiritual blessings" (3). On the other hand, the fact that the reprobate are not blessed with any of these spiritual blessings is also according to the eternal "purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will" (11).

One of the spiritual blessings we have in Christ is "redemption through his blood" (7). Thus the Son’s redemption or atonement is an instance of those spiritual blessings which come to us "according as he has chosen us in him before the foundation of the world" (4). Therefore, the Lord redeemed, shed His blood and died for the elect and not for the reprobate. Thus the elect are forgiven (7), adopted (5), accepted (6), made holy (4) and sealed with the Spirit (13) for their eternal inheritance (11, 14) on the basis of our Saviour’s cross. The reprobate do not receive any of the spiritual blessings of Christ’s sacrifice, for He did not die for them.

18. Romans 8 Teaches Particular Redemption

Romans 8 is also contrary to universal atonement. Verses 28-30 speak of a people whom God foreknew, predestinated, called according to His purpose, justified, glorified and conformed to the image of His Son. The apostle draws the following conclusion: "What shall we then say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against us?" (31). "Then" or "therefore" indicates that this is a logical inference based on his preceding statements, here called "these things." The "us" can only be those predestinated (or elected) and called according to God’s eternal purpose (28-30). Paul’s argument is this: If God is "for us" (31) in predestination, calling, justification and glorification (29-30), then "who can be against us?" (31). In other words, if God in His eternal decree has chosen us to everlasting bliss, called us out of darkness into His marvellous light, acquitted us of all our sins and reckoned us righteous with the very righteousness of Christ Himself, and glorified us in conforming us to the image of His Son, then "who can be against us?" (31).

The apostle reinforces this already compelling argument with another: "He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give us all things?" (32). Who are the "us" referred to twice here for whom God sent the Saviour to die? Again, they are those predestinated and called according to God’s eternal purpose (28-30). The only conclusion is that Christ died for the elect.

If it is objected that the Lord Jesus also died for the non-elect, then we reply that the passage gives absolutely no hint of this. In fact, this would make the passage teach that God sent His Son to die for those who are not predestinated and not called, justified, glorified or conformed to Christ. Moreover, if it is argued that the Saviour died for the reprobate, this would make the passage teach that the reprobate will receive all the blessings of His cross, for verse 32 teaches that God freely gives "all things" to those for whom Christ died. The "all things" include freedom from the law of sin and death (2), life and peace (6), adoption as God’s sons (14), the witness of the Spirit (16), an eternal inheritance (17), the redemption of the body at the resurrection of the just (23), the ability to pray in the Spirit (26), etc. Furthermore, the "all things" would also include the blessings of justification, calling, glorification and conformity to Christ according to God’s eternal predestination (28-30)! To read universal atonement into Romans 8:32 would mean that God freely gives the blessings of calling, justification and glorification to the reprobate, those whom He never calls, justifies or glorifies. This verse teaches an absolutely inseparable connection between those for whom Christ died and all these spiritual blessings. Some do not receive these blessings; therefore, the Saviour did not die for them.

Next Romans 8 declares that no charge (33) and no condemnation (34) can be laid against those who are justified (33), those for whom Christ died (34). But many charges are righteously made by the God of heaven against the reprobate wicked so that they are condemned! This is the case because they are not justified (33), for Jesus did not die for them and does not intercede for them (34).

19. The Reformed Creeds Teach Particular Redemption

On the basis of the Word of God and in keeping with the biblical arguments in this pamphlet, the creeds of the Reformed churches—in the British Isles, in continental Europe, in N. America and all around the world—teach that the Lord died for His elect church alone. The Canons of Dordt (1618-1619), produced by an international assembly of Reformed Protestants, clearly affirm that the Son of God redeemed the elect "and those only" (II:8) and that those who teach that He died for absolutely everybody speak "contemptuously of the death of Christ" and "bring again out of hell the Pelagian error" (II:R:3). American Presbyterian B. B. Warfield writes that the Canons were "published authoritatively in 1619 as the finding of the Synod [of Dordt] with the aid of a large body of foreign assessors, representative practically of the whole Reformed world. The Canons ... therefore ... [possess] the moral authority of the decrees of practically an Ecumenical Council throughout the whole body of Reformed Churches" (Works, vol. 9, p. 144).

The Westminster Confession states, "Neither are any other redeemed by Christ ... but the elect only" (3:6; cf. 8:1; 11:4; 13:1). These articles were included in the Congregationalist Savoy Declaration (1658) and the Baptist Confession (1689). Thus the creeds of Presbyterians, Congregationalists and Baptists all teach limited atonement or particular redemption. All who recite the Westminster Shorter Catechism confess that Jesus Christ is the "only Redeemer of God’s elect" (A. 21). The Reformed creeds simply set forth the Bible’s teaching on this subject. Let us believe and hold fast to scriptural truth, spread it near and far, and honour the crucified and victorious Christ who laid down His life for His beloved sheep (John 10:15)!


--
Reasonable Christian Blog Glory be to the Father, and to the Son : and to the Holy Ghost; Answer. As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be : world without end. Amen. 1662 Book of Common Prayer

Support Reasonable Christian Ministries with your generous donation.